Modernization is a process
of socio-cultural transformation. It is a thoroughgoing process of change
involving values, norms, institutions and structures. Political dimensions of
modernization involve the creation of a modern nation-state and the development of
key institutions political parties, bureaucratic structures, legislative bodies
and a system of elections based on universal franchise and secret ballot.
Cultural modernization involves adherence to nationalistic ideology, belief in
equality, freedom and humanism, and a rational and scientific outlook. Economic
modernization involves industrialization accompanied by the monetization of the economy, increasing division of labour, use of management techniques and
improved technology and the expansion of the service sector. Social modernization
involves universalistic values, achievement motivation, increasing mobility
both social and geographic increasing literacy and urbanization and the decline
of traditional authority.
{tocify} $title={Table of Contents}
Secular and scientific
education act as an important means of modernization. It helps in the diffusion
of modern values of equality, freedom and humanism. The modern school system
can inculcate achievement motivation. These values can form the basis of new
relations in the society and the growth of rationality can enable the development
of the administrative system. The diffusion of values of equality, freedom and humanism
can lay the foundations of a democratic political system. The spread of modern
education in the second half of the 19th century led to the emergence of the modern
political elite in India who provided leadership in the freedom struggle. The
diffusion of scientific and technical knowledge by modern educational
institutions can help in the creation of skilled manpower to play the occupational
roles demanded by the industrial economy. Other values like individualism and
universalistic ethics etc. can also be inculcated through education. Thus,
education can be an important means of modernization. The importance of
education can be realized from the fact that all modernizing societies tend to
emphasize on universalization of education and the modernized societies have
already attained it.
What is Modernization?
Modernization or
modernisation refers to a model of an evolutionary transition from a
'premodern' or 'traditional' to a 'modern' society. The teleology of
modernization is described in social evolutionism theories, existing as a
template that has been generally followed by societies that have achieved
modernity. While it may theoretically be possible for some societies to make
the transition in entirely different ways, there have been no counterexamples
provided by reliable sources.
Historians link
modernization to the processes of urbanization and industrialisation, as well
as to the spread of education. As Kendall (2007) notes, "Urbanization
accompanied modernization and the rapid process of industrialization." In
sociological critical theory, modernization is linked to an overarching process
of rationalisation. When modernization increases within a society, the
individual becomes that much more important, eventually replacing the family or
community as the fundamental unit of society.
$ads={2}
The Modernisation Theory of Development
Modernization theory is a grand theory encompassing many different disciplines as
it seeks to explain how society progresses, what variables affect that
progress, and how societies can react to that progress. Modernization theory
focuses specifically on a type of modernization thought to have originated in
Europe during the 17th century, which brought social mores and technological
achievements into a new epoch.
Modernization theory is a theory used to explain the process of modernization
within societies. The theory looks at the internal factors of a country while
assuming that, with assistance, "traditional" countries can be
brought to development in the same manner more developed countries have.
Modernization theory attempts to identify the social variables which contribute
to the social progress and development of societies and seeks to explain the
process of social evolution. Modernization theory is subject to criticism
originating among socialist and free-market ideologies, world-systems
theorists, globalization theory and dependency theory among others.
Modernization theory not only stresses the process of change but also the
responses to that change. It also looks at internal dynamics while referring to
social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The
following are the modernization theories for development.
Modernization
theory is used to explain the
process of modernization within societies. Modernization refers to a model of a
progressive transition from a 'pre-modern' or 'traditional' to 'modern'
society. Modernization theory originated from the ideas of German
sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920), which provided the basis for the
modernization paradigm developed by Harvard sociologist Talcott
Parsons (1902–1979). The theory looks at the internal factors of a country
while assuming that with assistance, "traditional" countries can be
brought to development in the same manner more developed countries have been.
Modernization theory was a dominant paradigm in the social sciences in the 1950s
and 1960s, then went into a deep eclipse. It made a comeback after 1990 but
remains a controversial model.
Modernization
theory both attempts to identify
the social variables that contribute to social progress and
development of societies and seeks to explain the process of social
evolution. Modernization theory is subject to criticism originating among
socialist and free-market
ideologies, world-systems theorists, globalization theorists
and dependency theorists among others. Modernization theory stresses
not only the process of change but also the responses to that change. It also
looks at internal dynamics while referring to social and cultural structures
and the adaptation of new technologies. Modernization theory maintains that
traditional societies will develop as they adopt more modern practices.
Proponents of modernization theory claim that modern states are wealthier and
more powerful and that their citizens are freer to enjoy a higher standard of
living. Developments such as new data technology and the need to update
traditional methods in transport, communication and production, it is argued,
make modernization necessary or at least preferable to the status quo. That
view makes a critique of modernization difficult since it implies that such developments
control the limits of human interaction, not vice versa. It also implies that
human agency controls the speed and severity of modernization. Supposedly,
instead of being dominated by tradition, societies undergoing the process of
modernization typically arrive at forms of governance dictated by abstract
principles. Traditional religious beliefs and cultural traits, according to the
theory, usually become less important as modernization takes hold.
$ads={1}
Characteristics of Modernity or Modernization
In general, modernization
led to the introduction of hybrids, greenhouse technology, genetically
modified (GMO) food, the use of artificial fertilizers, insecticides, tractors and
the application of other scientific knowledge to replace traditional
agricultural practices. The above view is endorsed by Smith who pointed out
that modernisation is about exchanging older agriculture practices with
something more recent (Smith, 1973: 61). Agriculture societies can therefore be
regarded as modern when they display specific characteristics. The extent to which
these characteristics are exhibited gives an indication of the degree of
modernity that has been reached. The characteristics are cited succinctly by
Coetzee et al. (2007: 31) as:
¾
Readiness to accommodate
the process of transformation resulting from changes.
¾
Continuous broadening of
life experiences and receptiveness to new knowledge.
¾ Continuous planning,
calculability and readiness towards new experiences.
¾
Predictability of action
and the ability to exercise effective control.
¾
High premium on technical
skills and understanding of the principles of production.
¾
Changing attitudes to
kinship, family roles, family size and the role of religion.
¾ Changing consumer behaviour
and the acceptance of social stratification
Stages of Modernization
Nurkse's vicious circle of poverty states that a society is poor because it
is poor. A society with low income has both a low level of serving and a low level
of consumption. Nurkse was in favour of attaining balanced growth in both the
industrial and agricultural sectors of the economy. He recognized that the
expansion and inter-sectoral balance between agriculture and manufacturing is
necessary so that each of these sectors provides a market for the products of
the other and in turn, supplies the necessary raw materials for the development
and growth of the other. Nurkse's theory discusses how the poor size of the
market in underdeveloped countries perpetuates its underdeveloped state. Nurkse
has also clarified the various determinants of the market size and puts primary
focus on productivity. According to him, if the productivity levels rise in a
less developed country, its market size will expand and thus it can eventually
become a developed economy. Apart from this, Nurkse has been nicknamed an
export pessimist, as he feels that the finances to make investments in
underdeveloped countries must arise from their own domestic territory.
Schumpeter's theory of motive force, process and goals, under this theory
Schumpeter explained the model of development that, the generating force is
provided by the entrepreneurships, the process is innovation and the goal is
the establishment of a position of wealth and power of entrepreneur. The
entrepreneurs disturb this equilibrium and are the prime cause of economic
development, which proceeds in a cyclic fashion along with several time scales. In
fashioning this theory connecting innovations, cycles, and development.
Schumpeter also thought that the institution enabling the entrepreneur to
purchase the resources needed to realize his or her vision was a well-developed
capitalist financial system, including a whole range of institutions for
granting credit. One could divide economists among, those who emphasized
"real" analysis and regarded money as merely a "veil" and
those who thought monetary institutions are important and money could be a
separate driving force. Both Schumpeter and Keynes were among the latter.
$ads={2}
¾ According to Alvin So, there are three main and historical
elements that were favourable to the inception of the modernization theory of
development after the Second World War. First, there was the rise of the United
States as a superpower. While other Western nations, such as Great Britain,
France, and Germany, were weakened by World War II, the United States emerged
from the war strengthened, and became a world leader with the implementation of
the Marshall Plan to reconstruct war-torn Western Europe.
¾ Second, there was the spread of a united world communist movement.
The Former Soviet Union extended its influence not only to Eastern Europe but
also to China and Korea. Third, there was the disintegration of European
colonial empires in Asia, Africa and Latin America, giving birth to many new nation-states in the Third World. These nascent nation-states were in search of
a model of development to promote their economy and enhance their political
independence.
¾ According to the modernization theory, modern societies are more
productive, children are better educated, and the needy receive more welfare.
According to Smelser’s analysis, modern societies have the particular feature
of social structural differentiation, that is to say, a clear definition of
functions and political roles from national institutions. Smelser argues that
although structural differentiation has increased the functional capacity of
modern organizations, it has also created the problem of integration, and of
coordinating the activities of the various new institutions.
¾ In a political sense, Coleman stresses three main features of
modern societies: a) Differentiation of political structure; b) Secularization
of political culture -with the ethos of equality-, which c) Enhances the
capacity of a society’s political system.
¾ The major assumptions of the modernization theory of development
basically are: Modernization is a phased process; for example, Rostow has 5
phases according to his theory of economic development for a particular
society, and I will mention them later. Modernization is a homogenizing
process, in this sense, we can say that modernization produces tendencies
toward convergence among societies, for example, Levy (1967, p. 207) maintains
that: “as time goes on, they and we will increasingly resemble one another
because the patterns of modernization are such that the more highly modernized
societies become, the more they resemble one another”.
¾ Modernization is a Europeanization or americanization process; in
the modernization literature, there is an attitude of complacency toward
Western Europe and the United States. These nations are viewed as having
unmatched economic prosperity and democratic stability (Tipps: 1976, 14). In
addition, modernization is an irreversible process, once started modernization
cannot be stopped. In other words, once third world countries come into contact
with the West, they will not be able to resist the impetus toward
modernization.
¾ Modernization is a progressive process that in the long run is
not only inevitable but desirable. According to Coleman, modernized political
systems have a higher capacity to deal with the function of national identity,
legitimacy, penetration, participation, and distribution than traditional
political systems. Finally, modernization is a lengthy process. It is an
evolutionary change, not a revolutionary one. It will take generations or even
centuries to complete, and its profound impact will be felt only through time.
All these assumptions are derived from European and American evolutionary
theory. There is also another set of classical assumptions based more
strictly on the functionalism-structuralism theory which emphasizes the
interdependence of social institutions, the importance of structural variables
at the cultural level, and the built-in process of change through homeostasis
equilibrium. These are ideas derived especially from Parsons’ sociological
theories.
¾ These assumptions are as follows: a) Modernization is a systematic
process. The attribute of modernity forms a consistent whole, thus appearing in
a cluster rather than in isolation; b) Modernization is a transformative
process; in order for a society to move into modernity its traditional
structures and values must be totally replaced by a set of modern values and c,) Modernization is an imminent process due to its systematic and
transformative nature, which builds change into the social system.
¾ One of the principal applications of modernization theory has been the economic field related to public policy decisions. From this perspective, it is very well known that the economic theory of modernization is based on the five stages of development from Rostow’s model. In summary, these five stages are traditional society, the precondition for takeoff, the takeoff process, the drive to maturity, and the high mass consumption society. According to this exposition, Rostow has found a possible solution for the promotion of Third World modernization. If the problem facing Third World countries resides in their lack of productive investments, then the solution lies in the provision of aid to these countries in the form of capital, technology, and expertise. The Marshall Plan and the Alliance for Progress in Latin America, are examples of programs that were influenced by Rostow’s political theories.
¾ The strengths of modernization theory can be defined in several
aspects. First, we can identify the basis of the research focus. Despite the
fact that the main studies of modernization were carried out by a psychologist,
a social psychologist, a sociologist of religion and a political sociologist,
other authors have extended modernization theory into other spheres. For
example, Bellah examines the role of the Tokugawas religion on pajanes economic
development in South-East Asia with effects on villages of Cambodia, Laos and
Burma; Lipset addresses the possible role of economic development in the
democratization of Third World countries, and Inkeles discusses the
consequences of the modernization process for individual attitudes and
behaviour.
¾ A second feature of the modernization perspective is the analytical framework. Authors assume that Third World countries are traditional and that Western countries are modern. In order to develop, those poor nations need to adopt Western values. In third place, the methodology is based on general studies; for example the expositions regarding the value factors in the Third World, and the differentiation between unstable democracies, dictatorships and stable dictatorships.
$ads={1}
The Rostow Model of Modernization
The Rostowian theory identifies the stages of Modernization as:
1. Primitive society: The stage is characterized by subsistence farming and barter trade.
2. Preparation for take-off: The characteristics of the stage are; specialization, production of surplus goods and trade. Transport infrastructure is developed to support trade. The stage encourages savings and investment
3. Take-off: At this stage industrialization increases and the economy switches from agriculture to manufacturing.
4. Drive to maturity: At this stage, the economy diversifies into new areas and there is less reliance on imports.
5. Period of mass consumption: At this stage, the economy gears on mass production and the service sector becomes increasingly dominating.
$ads={1}
Criticism of Modernization Theory
a.
From the
1960s, modernization theory has been criticized by numerous scholars,
including Andre Gunder Frank (1929 – 2005) and Immanuel
Wallerstein (born 1930). In this model, the modernization
of a society required the destruction of the indigenous culture and its
replacement by a more Westernized one. By one definition, modern simply
refers to the present, and any society still in existence is therefore modern.
Proponents of modernization typically view only Western society as being truly
modern and argue that others are primitive or unevolved by comparison. That
view sees unmodernized societies as inferior even if they have the same
standard of living as western societies. Opponents argue that modernity is
independent of culture and can be adapted to any society. Japan is cited as an
example by both sides. Some see it as proof that a thoroughly modern way of
life can exist in a non-western society. Others argue that Japan has
become distinctly more western as a result of its modernization
b. The theory has also been
criticised empirically, as modernization theorists ignore external sources of
change in societies. The binary between traditional and modern is unhelpful, as
the two are linked and often interdependent, and 'modernization' does not come as
a whole.
c.
Modernization theory has
also been accused of being Eurocentric, as modernization began in Europe,
with the Industrial Revolution, the French Revolution and
the Revolutions of 1848 (Macionis 953) and has long been regarded as
reaching its most advanced stage in Europe. Anthropologists typically make
their criticism one step further and say that the view is ethnocentric and is
specific to Western culture.
d.
Modernization theory, on
the other hand, was popular in the 1950s but was under heavy attack at the end
of the 60s. Criticisms of the theory include the following: First, development
is not necessarily unidirectional. This is an example of the ethnocentricity of
Rostow’s perspective. Second, the modernization perspective only shows one
possible model of development. The favoured example is the development pattern
in the United States. Nevertheless, in contrast with this circumstance, we can
see that there have been development advances in other nations, such as Taiwan
and South Korea; and we must admit that their current development levels have
been achieved by strong authoritarian regimes.
e. The second set of critiques
of the modernization theory regards the need to eliminate traditional values.
Third World countries do not have a homogeneous set of traditional values;
their value systems are highly heterogeneous. For example, Redfield 1965,
distinguishes between the great traditional values (values of the elites), and
the little tradition (values of the masses). The second aspect of criticism here
is the fact that traditional and modern values are not necessarily always
mutually exclusive: China, for example, despite advances in economic
development, continues to operate on traditional values and this appears to be
the same situation in Japan. Moreover, it is not possible to say that
traditional values are always dichotomous from modern status, for example,
loyalty to the Emperor can be transformed into loyalty to the firm.
f. The theory is criticized
for failing to consider the poor as the centrepiece in poverty reduction
initiatives. By ignoring the involvement and participation of the target
community, modernity achieves the marginalization of their commitment, creativity
and support of the intervention strategies. The intervention strategy becomes
an imposed strategy and such a strategy fails to construct adequate notions of
both the causal powers of social structures and the role of human agency in
shaping social relations in general.
g.
Perhaps the most crippling
weakness of the modernization theory is its oversimplified view of social
change (Coetzee et al., 2007: 101). Human nature has a propensity to resist
change in favour of the status quo. Change is resisted because it brings in
elements of uncertainty.
h.
The other intriguing
weakness of the modernisation theory is that it is based on deterministic
reason which states that within the linear model of socio-economic development,
changes are initiated externally. The determinist reason gives little room for
the reciprocal relationship between causation from within the developing region
and from outside the developing region
i. Modernization is associated
with development aid from developed countries. The idea was borrowed from
the Marshall Plan of post-World War II. Apparently, aid can be negotiated
either bilaterally or multilaterally. Whatever type of arrangement, aid (except
humanitarian Matunhu 67 aid) has strings attached to them. These strings have
tended to beneficiate the metropolitan states more than the recipient countries.
Thanks.Short but fine note.😍😀
ReplyDeleteThanks for your good explanation i was geting a confusion on modernity theory but now i have get an idea
ReplyDeleteThanks,well explained,
ReplyDeletecan your share the negative effects of modernization on an economy
ReplyDeletevery helpful,,,, thank u
ReplyDeleteThanks for this.Can you do applications and criticisms of development theories
ReplyDeleteIts is useful,and very helpfull.thanks .
ReplyDelete